WatchProSite|Market|Digest

ST 105 003

Featuresexpand_more
Spotlightexpand_more
Featured Forumsexpand_more
Brand Forumsexpand_more
Independent Brandsexpand_more
Lifestyleexpand_more
Resourcesexpand_more

OMEGA Chronograph caliber 321 THE MOON WATCH and it's iconic mesh strap

OMEGA SPEEDMASTER cal 321 and Jacoby Bender USA. mesh bracelet The Omega Speedmaster was officially qualified by NASA on March 1, 1965, for all crewed space missions and became standard issue for astronauts during the Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, and Apollo-So
26d
By: hmmmcamu
6
hmmmcamu
545

Hello dear Tony: absolutely agree with your thoughts on this modern EW. The use of a modern version of legendary 321 adds to the interest of this version...

... and regarding the "Bluberry" variant it would be easy for Omega to do it. I would like Omega could offer a blueberry bezel as an available accesory which we could buy at their boutiques. I personally like those bezels but I don´t think Omega would rel
1M
By: TonyR
22
Subexplorer
2167

Omega Speedmaster ST 105 003 " Ed White " Tropical dial.

The straight lugs, plus the patina of the dial... Desirable. Best, Nicolas
2M
By: amanico
15
amanico
872

Omega Speedmaster ST 105 002. A cool one.

This reference is magic, and a bit mysterious as it is a kind of transitional one, between the CK 2998 and the ST 105 003. Made only during one year or two. Rarer than any other CK, being 2915 or 2998. Add a nice patina, like this one, and you have someth
2Y
By: amanico
37
Dr No
9345

One of the attendees at our recent g-t-g has a line on a 105.003 . . .

. . . from the collection of the original owner. Same guy also has a Ploprof. Watch this space.
2Y
By: amanico
12
amanico
3130

Omega Speedmaster ST 105 003 Tropical.

A nice, very nice one I could see in Paris during one of our GTGs. I am not expert enough, but this one seems to be correct, maybe with the exception of the crown which should be Naiad? Best, Nicolas
2Y
By: amanico
12
amanico
3130

The Speedmaster legend 105.002 with alpha hands.

Was super happy to find this fantastic example of the transitional 105.002 Not many are aware of this reference which production lasted less than a year, some say 6 months. Identical to the 2998-62 although some 105.002 were also fitted with baton hands l
3Y
By: jlc.thomsen
24
jlc.thomsen
5508

Last batch . . .

. . . of photos; which can you identify? R S T U V W What I can say with a high degree of probablity is that there were examples of 2915, 2998, 105.002, 105.003, 105.012, and 145.012 present. There are some obvious models here, but others will require inf
3Y
By: Dr No
11
S F
2630

Ah, now I get the point of your question. No, expense was not the main reason driving . . .

. . . my decision for the re-issue, Nicolas. In the abstract, an original 2915 / 2998 / 105.002 / 105.003 / 105.012 / 145.012 would have been preferable. But because Omega made an effort to resurrect the legend, which was a gesture to the collector commun
4Y
By: holdemchamp1225
51
amanico
7536

A classic. Here is the ancestor, ST 105 003.

Credit: Brevetwatch.
4Y
By: Peter
11
holdemchamp1225
1425